Bulletin 14 - Limitationss of the data that need addressing
Incorporating the AIHW National Injury Surveillance Unit
Bulletin 14 - Limitationss of the data that need addressing [Previous] [Next] [Top]

Limitations of the data that need addressing


Completeness

Data on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander injury is incomplete. Queensland has only introduced Aboriginality on death registrations for 1996 and it may take some time for this to reach full reliability. It is evident that many health service collections do not reliably identify Aboriginality. Accurate identification of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in major health data and the death data is essential. There is a need to explore biases in the reporting of interpersonal violence and in particular the extent of differential identification of both violence and Aboriginality among women receiving hospital treatment.

Geographic specificity

At present it is not possible to analyse national hospitalisation data by geographic region. While all states and territories collect data about place of usual residence, the coding of geographic location varies, making it difficult to uniformly assign cases to classifications such as the Rural and Remote Area Classification system. Several states do not provide finely detailed geographic classification to the national data pool due to legislation requiring the absolute anonymity of unit record level data in the states. It is therefore not possible to present national data for urban, rural and remote dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. If states were prepared to introduce recoding to the Rural and Remote Area Classification system and attach this to unit records, this problem would be overcome.

In addition, it is only possible to obtain population data at detailed geographic level from the Census which, as pointed out above, is a biased estimator of some age and sex groups of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population.

The data presented on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander injury at state and national level is an aggregation of non-homogeneous populations. It is almost certain that the injury patterns among urban dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are different to those in rural areas and different again from those living traditional lifestyles in more remote areas. Setting priorities for prevention requires a better understanding of the injury patterns of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living different lifestyles.

Timeliness

National data collections have become more timely in recent years but considerable delays are still experienced, especially with larger systems such as those dealing with hospitalisations. As timeliness of these systems improves, the issue of having current year detailed population estimates will become more critical, as it is difficult to make sense of the information without adequate population denominators.

Level of detail of descriptions of injury causes

The level of detail of information available is not adequate to permit a thorough identification of causes and the setting of specific prevention priorities. While this should improve for deaths data if the National Coronial Information System is put in place, it is difficult to rapidly make changes of the kind necessary to the hospitalisations data collections. The number of contributing hospitals and the commitment to implementing changes through the National Health Information Agreement increases quality but does not provide a basis for rapid changes to be made. Alternative ways of obtaining more detail and greater reliability of information need to be considered if better information on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander injury patterns are to be produced in the short term.

Given the size of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations and (despite the high rate of injury) the relatively small number of injury cases, it will be necessary to supplement existing data. This could be done in a number of ways. The development of surveillance techniques for small communities, that encompass both prospective and retrospective quantitative and qualitative material, is required, and a project to develop new methods for small communities is under way in Cairns. In addition, cause-specific studies are needed to move beyond broad descriptive epidemiology to more detailed understanding of injury causes and possible prevention strategies.

Conclusion

Data concerning injury among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples lack the precision and coverage that is desirable. Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence to show that injury rates are significantly higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples than their non-Aboriginal counterparts. In the short term, existing data can be used to start setting prevention priorities, but improvement in hospitalisation, death and population data is needed to provide a more definitive picture of injury patterns.

New methods of injury surveillance that take into account the different lifestyles of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are required to better understand how to reduce the injury burden. Injury cause classifications that are more culturally applicable are needed and attention is required to lessen the possibility that data reported by health services contain hidden biases.

[Previous] [Next] [Top]

Contact us:
Tel: +61 8 8201 7602
Fax: +61 8 8374 0702
Send an Email
RCIS is a Research Centre of the Flinders University of South Australia
NISU is a collaborating unit of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
jointly funded by AIHW and the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing
Privacy Statement
Copyright & Disclaimer
Site Comments to NISU