Incorporating the AIHW National Injury Surveillance Unit
Bulletin 16 - Clinical information [Previous] [Next] [Top]

Clinical information


The clinical picture of persisting cases of SCI was affected by incomplete reporting.

There were 62 cases for whom the neurological level of injury at discharge was not reported and a further one case for whom the extent of injury was not reported. Analysis of the characteristics of these cases compared with the other 177 cases for whom neurological level and extent of injury was reported revealed no significant nor substantial differences on the basis of the neurological level of injury at admission, the extent of injury at admission, age group, and length of stay in hospital. Given that there was no evidence of unrepresentativeness, the following discussion of the neurological level, extent of injury and length of hospital stay was based on the 177 cases for whom neurological level and extent of injury was reported.

ASIA impairment category was not reported at discharge for 42 of the 240 persisting cases of SCI. Comparison of these cases with the 198 cases for whom that information was reported, revealed no significant nor substantial differences on the basis of neurological level of injury at admission, extent of injury at admission, age group, length of stay in hospital, and ASIA impairment category at admission. Given that there was no evidence of unrepresentativeness, the following discussion of the ASIA impairment category at discharge was based on the 198 cases for which those data were reported.


Neurological level of injury

Figure 6 presents the neurological level at discharge (n=177). The most commonly injured segments of the spinal cord were C5 (21%), C6 (15%), C4 (9%), L1 (7%), T12 (6%) and C7 (6%). Fifty-two per cent of the cases (n=92) had an injury to the cervical segments, resulting in `Tetraplegia'. With Tetraplegia, there is impairment of function in the arms as well as in the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs. Forty-eight per cent of the cases (n=85) had an injury to the thoracic, lumbar or sacral (but not cervical) segments of the spinal cord, resulting in `Paraplegia'. With Paraplegia, arm functioning is spared, but, depending on the level of injury, the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs may be involved. For Paraplegia, the most common level of injury was L1, followed by T12 and T1.

Note: Neurological level was not reported for 63 cases

Neurologic category

The overall severity of SCI is usually measured by a combination of both the neurological level and extent of injury. The standard combination involves the creation of five neurologic categories: incomplete paraplegia, complete paraplegia, incomplete tetraplegia, complete tetraplegia, and complete recovery.[10] In the context of a discussion of persisting cases of SCI the last category is excluded.

Table 1 presents the counts and column percentages for neurologic level and extent of injury (n=177). Complete injury was a more prominent feature of injury to the thoracic segments of the spine (n=24, 49%), than it was for the cervical (n=34, 37%), lumbar (n=7, 23%), or sacral (n=1, 20%) segments of the spine. Complete cord injuries are relatively common among patients with thoracic fractures and dislocations because the spinal canal in this region is small in relation to the size of the cord.[13] [14] [15] [16] Based on all cases, the most common neurologic category (for all cases, n=177) was incomplete Tetraplegia (n=58, 33%), followed by incomplete Paraplegia (n=53, 30%), complete Tetraplegia (n=34, 19%), and complete Paraplegia (n=32, 18%).

Table 1: Incidence of persisting SCI from traumatic causes by neurological level (major grouping) and extent of injury at discharge, Australia 1995/96 (counts and column percentages)
Extent of injury Tetraplegia Paraplegia Total
Cervical Thoracic Lumbar Sacral All Paraplegia
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %
Complete 34 37 24 49 7 23 1 20 32 38 66 37
Incomplete 58 63 25 51 24 77 4 80 53 62 111 63
Total 92 100 49 100 31 100 5 100 85 100 177 100
Note: Neurologic category was not reported for 63 cases out of the 240 persisting cases of SCI

The external cause of injury for persisting cases of SCI from traumatic causes is presented by neurological level of injury in Table 2. Motor vehicle occupants were most likely to suffer from injury to the cervical segments of the spinal cord. Complete injury occurred to 40% (n=19) of the occupants. Unprotected road users were most likely to suffer from injury to the thoracic segments of the spine. Complete injury occurred to 32% (n=8) of the unprotected road users. Whereas Tetraplegia was most common amongst motor vehicle occupants, Paraplegia was most common amongst unprotected road users. Low falls (i.e. falls on the same level or from less than one metre in height) exclusively resulted in cervical level damage. Cervical level damage to the spinal cord was also common in high falls (i.e. falls from a height of one metre or higher). Complete injury occurred to 18% (n=2) of the low falls cases and to 41% (n=21) of the high falls cases.

Table 2: Incidence of persisting SCI from traumatic causes by external cause (major groupings), and neurological level, of injury at discharge, Australia, 1995/96 (counts and row percentages)
Extent of injury Tetraplegia Paraplegia Total
Cervical Thoracic Lumbar Sacral All Paraplegia
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %
Motor vehicle occupants 29 62 10 21 6 13 2 4 18 38 47 100
Unprotected road users 9 36 12 48 4 16 0 0 16 64 25 100
Low falls 11 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 100
High falls 25 49 14 28 11 22 1 2 26 51 51 100
Other causes 18 42 13 30 10 23 2 5 25 58 43 100
Table Total 92 52 49 28 31 18 5 3 85 48 177 100
Note: Neurological level and extent of injury was not reported for 63 cases out of the 240 persisting cases of SCI

ASIA impairment category

To measure the change in the degree of impairment of cases in response to the combined effects of treatment in the acute care facility, rehabilitation and other factors, the ASIA impairment category[5] of each case was recorded at both admission and discharge. This measure of impairment was derived from the Frankel cord injury scale.[17] [18] The categories relevant to an assessment of persisting cases of SCI are presented below:

A = Complete.
No sensory or motor function is preserved in the sacral segments S4-S5.
B = Incomplete.
Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and extends through the sacral segments S4-S5.
C = Incomplete.
Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and the majority of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3.
D = Incomplete.
Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and the majority of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade greater than or equal to 3.
A comparison of the ASIA category at admission and discharge is presented in Table 3. This information facilitates an assessment of the degree of change in impairment between admission and discharge. The ASIA category was reported at discharge for 198 cases but for four of these it was not reported at admission. The table is therefore based on the 194 cases for whom that information was reported both at admission and discharge.

For the majority of cases (n=141, 73%), there was no change in the degree of impairment between admission and discharge. This was particularly true for the admission ASIA categories of `A' and `D'. For a small number of cases (n=4, 2%) there was an apparent increase in the extent of impairment between admission and discharge. This could reflect a coding error either at admission or discharge, rather than a real increase in impairment, but warrants a further assessment. For one quarter of the cases (n=49, 25%) there was a reduction in the extent of impairment. Numerically, this reduction was particularly strong from a category `C' at admission to a category `D' at discharge (n=19, 10%), indicating a clinically significant improvement in muscle functioning for these cases. The reduction in impairment from category `A' at admission to category `D' at discharge (n=7, 4%) is clinically very significant. It demonstrates an improvement from a state of no sensory or motor functioning in the sacral segments S4-S5, to sensory preservation and useful motor functioning in the majority of key muscles below the neurological level of injury.

Table 3: Incidence of persisting SCI from traumatic causes by ASIA impairment category at admission and discharge, Australia 1995/96 (counts and percentages)
  ASIA category at admission
A B C D Total reported
ASIA category
at discharge
Count % Count % Count % Count % Count %
A 62 32 1 1 1 1 0 0 64 33
B 7 4 16 8 0 0 1 1 24 12
C 3 1 8 4 25 13 1 1 37 19
D 7 4 5 3 19 10 38 20 69 36
Total reported 79 41 30 16 45 24 40 22 194 100
Note: ASIA impairment category was not reported at admission and/or discharge for 46 cases.

Length of hospital stay

Table 4 presents information on the average length of stay (ALOS) in hospital, from the date of injury to the date of discharge from the SU, by neurologic category for the 177 cases for which neurologic category was reported. It shows that the ALOS was much longer for Tetraplegia than for Paraplegia. The ALOS was longest for complete Tetraplegia, followed by complete Paraplegia, incomplete Tetraplegia, and incomplete Paraplegia. The ALOS decreased with a decrease in the neurological level of injury, from the cervical through to the sacral segments of the spine, for both complete and incomplete injuries.

Table 4: Incidence of persisting SCI from traumatic causes by neurological level (major grouping) and extent of injury at discharge, Australia 1995/96 (counts and average length of stay)
Extent of injury Tetraplegia Paraplegia Total
Cervical Thoracic Lumbar Sacral All Paraplegia  
Count ALOS (days) Count ALOS (days) Count ALOS (days) Count ALOS (days) Count ALOS (days) Count ALOS (days)
Complete 34 252 24 160 7 97 1 53 32 143 66 199
Incomplete 58 119 25 95 24 60 4 27 53 74 111 98
Total 92 168 49 127 31 68 5 32 85 100 177 135
Note: Neurologic category was not reported for 63 cases out of the 240 persisting cases of SCI


[5] American Spinal Injury Association. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Chicago: American Spinal Injury Association, 1992.

[10] Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG. Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the Model Systems. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, 1995.

[13] Bauer, RD, Errico, TJ. Thoracolumbar spine injuries. In: Errico TJ; Bauer, RD, Waugh, T. (Eds). Spinal trauma. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1991, pp. 195-269.

[14] Bohlman, HH. Treatment of fractures and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 165-169.

[15] Bohlman, HH, Freehafer, A, Dejak, J. The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 360-369.

[16] White A, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Second Edition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1990, p. 333.

[17] Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7(3): 179-192.

[18] Tator CH, Rowed DW, Schwartz ML. (eds): Sunnybrook cord injury scales for assessment of neurological injury and neurological recovery in early management of acute spinal cord injury. New York: Raven Press, 1982: 7.


[Previous] [Next] [Top]
Contact us:
Tel: +61 8 8201 7602
Fax: +61 8 8374 0702
Send an Email
RCIS is a Research Centre of the Flinders University of South Australia
NISU is a collaborating unit of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
jointly funded by AIHW and the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing
Privacy Statement
Copyright & Disclaimer
Site Comments to NISU