Coronial Study - Implementation plan
Implementation plan
The information necessary to meet the expanded role of coroners, and the needs of other users,
is generally readily available during coroners' investigations. Current information systems are
oriented toward dealing with a single case and do not, necessarily, systematically record the
information required to take a broader view. The challenge in developing a new system is to
capture relevant information in a systematic manner and to make this readily accessible to coroners
and researchers.
It is difficult to accurately detail the exact number of cases to be processed in each year or
the categories into which these cases fall. The table below presents an annual estimate based on
ABS deaths data for 1990-1992
Table 3 Estimate of average number of deaths certified by a
coroner annually in Australia
Type of Death Expected Annual Source of estimate
presentation to
coroners
Transportation 2550 ABS Deaths 90-92
Work 500 Worksafe study
Consumer product Unknown
Deaths in custody 80 AIC 1993
Intentional inflicted 350 ABS Deaths 90-92
by other
Intentional self 2938 ABS Deaths 90-92
inflicted
Drowning 430 ABS Deaths 92
Total external cause 7500 ABS Deaths 90-92
Non external cause 10500 ABS Deaths 90-92
Total coroner 18000 ABS Deaths 90-92
certified deaths
Note: The number of deaths in each category, and the total, are separately estimated as
some deaths fall into more than one category. For example 20-30% of work related deaths are also
transport related.
The number of cases for which information is to be processed is not large. Many detailed items
are not required for all cases. For example, sudden natural cause deaths will require only minimal
core information to be completed, brief findings and no detail for major users. The system which is
needed, therefore, need not place an undue load on coroners, nor require levels of resourcing which
are prohibitive. The processing of core information should be subsidised by major users, and the
cost of processing more detailed information for particular users should be covered by the users
defining them. Inclusion of the more detailed data would, however, benefit coroners by allowing
them to use the variables generated, in the searches and analysis.
This study has identified core information and the information required to meet the needs of
key user groups. At first, the list seems large and complex. Most of the information is already
included in coroners' files but is not readily accessible. Where it is not, the introduction of
investigative protocols for key types of cases and standard ways of recording information across
all jurisdictions could easily obtain and standardise the required information. Coroners' clerks
already operate to ensure that the necessary information is available to the coroner and would play
a vital role in ensuring that information is complete, and that the relevant protocols were used.
Table 4 presents a summary of the data required.
Table 4 Data Summary Map
All cases All Work Road Consumer Deaths in
external related related product custody
causes related
n = 18000 n = 7500 n = 500 n=2550 n = unknown n = 80
Sex Diagnosis / Industry Event Brand and Education
Day of birth injuries Mechanism Incident model of level
Month of birth received of injury identifier product Living
Year of birth Intent / disease Crash type Detailed arrangemen
Country of Manner of Agency of Road user product ts prior
birth death injury / movement description to
Marital status External disease Road Year of custody
Aboriginality Cause of Task structure manufacture Custodial
Usual death being Speed limit Manufacturer authority
residence SLA Activity at performed Alignment Retailer involved
Employment time of Time on Weather Country of Time last
status death task Surface Origin seen
Usual Products Usual Job type Year of alive and
Occupation and factors Experience Surface purchase reasonably
Age of BAC % on task condition First OK
marriage Prescription Work Light language Time
Date of drugs classifica Street found
marriage Other drugs tion lighting dead or
No of issue Other Shift Death in a
Drowning substances Usual vehicle distressed
classification toxicology shift Incident state
Cancer flag Hours on identifier which
Maternal death shift Vehicle progressed
flag Response type to death
TB flag to injury Vehicle Legal
Leukemia flag Use of make and status
AIDS / HIV protective model (remand,
flag State of sentenced)
Asthma flag equipment registration
Drugs, Training Reason
smoking, history Drivers bail
alcohol flag Safety licence denied
Asbestosis procedures type Offence
flag Towed away or
Diabetes flag Operator alleged
State of BAC offence
registration Operator leading
of death sex to
Date of Operator custody
registration age Length of
Registration No of time in
number occupants custody
Time of death Vehicle Period of
Day of death fault sentence
Month of death Other served
vehicle (1 Health
Year of death set per status
Type of place vehicle) (Physical
of incident Incident and
SLA of identifier mental
incident Vehicle covering
Place of death type significan
Vehicle t events
PM defined make and including
cause of death model suicide
PM summary State of attempts,
Description of registration etc.)
circumstances HIV
Coroner's Drivers status
summary licence
Major cause type
type Towed away
Work related Operator
flag BAC
Road related Operator
flag sex
Consumer Operator
product age
related flag No of
Death in occupants
custody Vehicle
External cause fault
flag Deceased
Anaesthetic details
death flag Seat belt
Suicide flag use
Other external Position in
cause flag vehicle
Death in
custody
Natural flag
SIDS flag
Other natural
death flag
|